In a trial in Becker in 1895, an interesting bit of local
law proceedings were reported in the Sherburne
County Star News: Thomas Parento accused Fred Specovious of stealing hay
valued at eight dollars. After two hours
of testimony and five hours of jury deliberation, no conclusion was
reached. We had a “hung jury.” The local magistrate, Judge Shephardson
suggested that if the two parties could settle on the matter, jury costs would
be reduced. At this point, the court
costs amounted to $20. A cost of more
than twice the value of the missing hay.
Parento and Specovious agreed to drop the case and split a $7 fee for
court costs.
I am not sure if this reveals the wisdom of the court, or
the two farmers saw the economic advantages to a settlement. Regardless of the underlying “moral of the
story,” the report does highlight the pragmatic approach often displayed in the
court room in small towns in the Midwest.
No comments:
Post a Comment